Grand Canyon University The Nature of Spirituality Discussion

Based on the required topic study materials, write a reflection about worldview and respond to following:

In 750-1,000 words, answer each of the worldview questions according to your own personal perspective and worldview:What is ultimate reality?What is the nature of the universe?What is a human being?What is knowledge?What is your basis of ethics?What is the purpose of your existence? Course Code
PHI-413V
Class Code
PHI-413V-O502
Criteria
Content
Percentage
90.0%
Christian Perspective of Spirituality and Ethics in
Contrast to Postmodern Relativism
30.0%
Scientism and Arguments
30.0%
Personal Perspective and Worldview
30.0%
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
10.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Worldview Analysis and Personal Inventory
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of
postmodern relativism is incomplete or insufficient.
Explanation of scientism or the explanations of two main
arguments against scientism are inaccurate. Details are not
supported.
Worldview questions are not fully answered.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
100.0
Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of
postmodern relativism is unclear. Explanation is not
supported by topic study materials.
Description of scientism is accurate. Explanations of two main
arguments against scientism are unclear. Details are not
clearly supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview questions is answered but is lacking a
personal connection or clarity.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (75.00%)
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of
postmodern relativism is clear. Explanation is not supported
by topic study materials.
Explanation of scientism is clear. Explanations of two main
arguments against scientism are clear. Details are supported
by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview questions is answered with personal
connection.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (85.00%)
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of
postmodern relativism is clear and detailed. Explanation is
supported by topic study materials.
Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of
two main arguments against scientism are clear. Details are
clearly supported by topic study materials.
Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with
personal connection.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
Explanation of the Christian perspective of the nature of
spirituality and ethics in contrast to the perspective of
postmodern relativism is clear, detailed, and demonstrates a
deep understanding of the subject. Explanation is supported
by topic study materials.
Explanation of scientism is clear and accurate. Explanations of
two main arguments against scientism are clear and
insightful. Details are clearly supported by topic study
materials.
Each of the worldview questions is answered clearly and with
deep personal insight.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Comments
Points Earned