Health Care Financial Reform Proposal

Compose (1,000-1,250 words) on what you think should be included in future trends of the health care system. Include the following points in your proposal about the future trends:

1. Considering the incorporation of technology such as HMIS and artificial intelligence, how will technology benefit health care, how might it be regulated, and how many people in the market would have access to this technology?
2. How would your future trend improve efficiency, impact quality, and promote positive patient outcomes?
3. Would your proposal have an effect on profitability, financial resources, return on investment (ROI), and the rising costs of health care? How would you adjust your proposal to account for competition in the market?
4. Would there be an impact if payment sources were changed?

Include at least three references, including your textbook, to support your position.

Please follow the rubric. It tells you what is to be done.

Health Care Financial Reform Proposal – Rubric

Technology 18 points

Criteria Description

Technology

5. Excellent 18 points

The essay creatively and skillfully describes the future trends of incorporating

technology in health

care.

4. Good 15.3 points

The essay skillfully describes the future trends of incorporating technology in health

care.

3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

The essay clearly describes the future trends of incorporating technology in health

care.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

The essay minimally describes the future trends of incorporating technology in

health care.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The essay does not adequately describe the future trends of incorporating

technology in health care.

Improvement of E�ciency 18 points

Criteria Description

Improvement of Efficiency

5. Excellent 18 points

The essay creatively and skillfully describes how future improvement can boost

efficiency in health care.

4. Good 15.3 points

Collapse All

The essay skillfully describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in

health care.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

The essay clearly describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in health

care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

The essay minimally describes how future improvements can boost efficiency in

health care.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The essay does not adequately describe how future improvements can boost

efficiency in health care.

Finance and Accounting 18 points

Criteria Description

Finance and Accounting

5. Excellent 18 points

The essay skillfully and thoughtfully describes the future trends of profitability,

financial

resources,

return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.

4. Good 15.3 points

The essay thoughtfully describes the future trends of profitability, financial

resources, return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.

3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

The essay clearly describes the future trends of profitability, financial resources,

return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

The essay minimally describes the future trends of profitability, financial resources,

return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The essay does not adequately describe the future trends of profitability, financial

resources, return on investment, and the rising costs of health care.

Impact of Payment Sources 18 points

Criteria Description

Impact of Payment Sources

5. Excellent 18 points

The proposal skillfully and thoughtfully describes if there will be an impact if

payment sources

were

changed.

4. Good 15.3 points

The proposal thoughtfully describes if there will be an impact if payment sources

were changed.
3. Satisfactory 13.5 points

The proposal includes a basic description if there will be an impact if payment

sources were changed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 11.7 points

The proposal minimally describes if there will be an impact if payment sources were

changed.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

The proposal does not adequately describe if there will be an impact if payment

sources were changed.

Thesis Development and Purpose 5.4 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent 5.4 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement

makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good 4.59 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and

reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory 4.05 points

Thesis is apparent and

appropriate to purpose.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.51 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Paragraph Development and Transitions 5.4 points

Criteria Description

Paragraph Development and Transitions

5. Excellent 5.4 points

There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress

and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.

Paragraph structure is seamless.

4. Good 4.59 points

A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit

a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are

appropriate to purpose.
3. Satisfactory 4.05 points

Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in

organization or in their relationship to each other.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 3.51 points

Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity,

coherence, or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent

connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to

purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language

use)
4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent 4.5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good 3.82 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The

writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3. Satisfactory 3.38 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to

the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate

language are employed.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 2.93 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in

language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct

but not varied.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 0.9 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent 0.9 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good 0.77 points

Appropriate template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory 0.68 points

Appropriate template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor

errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 0.59 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of

control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Appropriate template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely

followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources 1.8 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as

appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent 1.8 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment

and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good 1.53 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is

mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory 1.35 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some

formatting errors may be present.

2. Less Than Satisfactory 1.17 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to

assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory 0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 90 points