Persuasive Speech Materials powerpoint outline

Submit two files.

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper
  1. Submit the persuasive speech preparation outline in Microsoft Word using the SPCH275 Speech Preparation Outline Template with a References list in APA format on the last page. Your research for your topic should include a minimum of three to five academic peer-reviewed articles or books from scholarly sources cited within the outline. Research should include opposing viewpoints to your stance and incorporate at least one into your outline, followed by a strong rebuttal. The DeVry Library is the recommended source for your scholarly research. Although reputable website sources are acceptable, they should not replace the required minimum of three to five academic peer-reviewed articles or books from a scholarly source. Three sources should be parenthetically cited on the outline (Author, Year). Any source listed as a Reference must be cited in the outline. (75 points)
  2. Include a copy of the PowerPoint file and any other visual aids to be used in the presentation. You should have 5-8 slides, plus a title slide at the beginning and a reference slide at the end (in addition to your 5-8 slides of content). Visuals should have a professional quality; not too much written on each slide; pictures should be copyright cleared and have citations on the slide. (75 points)

Technology: Stop Letting it Control You DeVry University Page 1

Name: Student Name

Professor: Professor Name

Assignment: Persuasive Speech Outline

Save Time On Research and Writing
Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.
Get My Paper

Title of Presentation: Technology: Stop Letting it Control You

Date: Month Day, Year

General Purpose: To persuade the audience that technology has been harming society.

Specific Purpose: To persuade the audience to limit their use of technology.

Thesis Statement: Personal communication should not be replaced by social media or any other type of digital technology.

I.
Introduction

A. Attention-getter: I want to begin by asking you, the audience, a few questions… is the explosion of technology bringing us closer together or creating distance between us? Is society as we know it to be right now headed in a dangerous direction?

B. Relevance statement: Most, if not many of us, use social media daily. It’s part of our lives whether we like it or not. From just talking to friends or trying to promote our business or even finding a new job and connecting with people to try to get that job, social media is here to stay.

C. Credibility statement: Lauren Klein from UC Berkeley is an expert in Psychology and is devoted to the study of humans and how they interact. She asks an important question, “Do digital devices and social media really disconnect us from the flesh-and-blood people in our lives? Or can mobile devices actually add to our social capital?” (Klein, 2014).

E. Preview statement: I am going to present to all of you how new tech has evolved and affected our society along with the positive and negative consequences of using those technological outlets and how we can lessen those side effects and properly supplement new tech into our lives.

Transition: Let me begin by talking a little about how social media started and how it has affected our lives.

II.
Body

A. The dawn of a new era with the help of technology and its various media outlets are creating opportunities and also new issues within our social structure.

1. We should understand the origins of social media, how it has changed our society for the better, but also has pushed us apart.

a. Connecting with people has been easier than ever. Businesses and jobs have been booming with the help of technology and social media.

b. Baecker, who is an expert in human-computer interaction and a Professor of 

Computer Science

at the 

University of Toronto

, states that “Large numbers of individuals, many of them senior citizens, live in social isolation. This typically leads to loneliness, depression, and vulnerability, and subsequently to other negative health consequences. By researching and understanding the needs of people in environments associated with social isolation, it’s shown that technology facilitates social connection” (Baecker et al., 2014).

c. Technology addiction and online bullying are issues that are resulting from these new social channels of communication.

2. Counter viewpoint: Social media is not the problem. The problem is a divided society that has a lack of civility and not enough respect for diverse points of view. Technology has more benefits than drawbacks and can enhance personal communication and actually bring people closer together.

Transition: Now, let’s talk about how technology affects us socially and ways that we can try to reduce the negative effects.

B. Imagining how a typical day starts with the use of tech and how we are being affected.

1. We shouldn’t be attached to technology and our phones looking at them constantly. It’s unhealthy, and it’s definitely not what technology was intended for.

2. Technology addiction is causing a breakdown in our social structures.

a. Nowadays we see people talking or texting to one another through their handy dandy phones instead of having a nice conversation and human interaction.

b. We should practice abstinence from technology, or at least partially abstain to better our lives.

c. Barb Boose couldn’t have said it any better when she states that, “At first glance, having many friends or contacts on social networks implies a great sense of connectedness. However, you likely have experienced the downside of electronic social circles, such as the recent party or lunch where other guests were staring into their digital devices and tapping messages to others. The connectedness of one-on-one conversations may be lost to the digital connectedness” (Boose, 2015).

Transition: Living in a world filled with new gadgets coming out every year, one can feel smothered with joy and endless amounts of entertainment. Even though we may think that we’re not dependent on new tech, you might want to stop, think, and consider taking a break.

C. Society is becoming so dependent on tech and social media that it’s becoming the new normal.

1. Stop, think, take a break.

2. Take up a few new hobbies to distract yourself from any type of tech that’s in your house.

a. Go over a neighbor or friend’s house and have a friendly conversation

b. Learn something new. Start a new hobby, maybe cooking or gardening? Home improvements? Try anything that catches your interest.

3. Try and get into your self-aware state of mind and leave all distractions aside.

Transition: Now that we have a better understanding of how technology has affected us socially, it is up to us, every single one of us to stop, and think… will we supplement technology into our lives? Or will we let it control us?

III.
Conclusion

A. Tech and social media along with other new gadgets have vastly improved our way of living. It has its caveats that we as a society must learn from in order to be able to supplement the beauty of new tech, not be controlled by it. Learning to take a break from it all and getting involved with new hobbies or making new connections is what life is all about, not being stuck on a screen and addicted to technology.

a. a study done in 2017 consisting of 94 participants undergoing 224 trials, led by psychologists created different tests on identifying emotions and how they show importance to the way we socialize (Wegrzyn et al., 2017).

B. Technology is here to stay. Connectivity, communication, and its vast amounts of outputs are bound to evolve. Remember what I said earlier? We ARE social creatures. We weren’t meant to be isolated.

C. Will you let yourself be controlled by technology? Or, will you let it be just a small part of your social interaction? Only you, every single one of you, really know the answer to that. I hope today I have been able to convince you of the reasons why you should limit your use of technology.

D. Let’s get out there in the real world and explore what is has to offer!

References

Baecker, R., Sellen, K., Crosskey, S., Boscard, V., & Barbosa Neves, B. (2014). Technology to reduce social isolation and loneliness. ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility, 27-34. https://doi-org.devry.idm.oclc.org/10.1145/2661334.2661375

Boose, B (2015, May 6). Does technology connect or isolate us? Des Moines University, Medicine and Health Services. https://www.dmu.edu/news/2010/08/does-technology-connect-or-isolate-us/

Klein, L (2014, March 12). Does technology cut us off from other people? Greater Good Science Center, UC Berkeley https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/does_technology_cut_us_off_from_other_people

Wegrzyn, M., Vogt, M., Kireclioglu, B., Schneider, J., & Kissler, J. (2017). Mapping the emotional face. How individual face parts contribute to successful emotion recognition. PloS one, 12(5), e0177239. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177239

LMA.SPCH275.WK6.JAN22

16 pts

21 pts

26 pts

Excellent: Student Performance: Strong, original central idea that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.

3 pts

Competent: Student Performance: Central ideas with few tangents and diversions that unifies the argument but lacks clarity or creativity.

2 pts

Limited: Student Performance: Attempts to form a cohesive idea, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key component

1 pts

Poor: Student Performance: No unifying central idea to link key components of the argument together.

0 pts

Does Not Meet ExpectationsUnacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

4 pts

4 pts

4 pts

4 pts

4 pts

4 pts

LMA.SPCH275.WK6.JAN22

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Critical Thinking

26 to >23.0 pts

Excellent
The outline includes a strong, central idea for the speech that provides a unified trajectory of inquiry and analysis that is sustained throughout.

23 to >20.0 pts

Competent
The outline illustrates a central idea for the speech with few tangents and diversions that unifies the main idea but lacks clarity or creativity

20 to >17.0 pts

Limited
The outline indicates a central idea for the speech, but lacks concrete focus and unification of key components.

17 to >14.0 pts

Poor
The outline does not include a unifying central idea for the speech to link key components of the argument together.

14 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The outline does not address this competency.

26 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Communication

16 to >13.0 pts

Excellent
The outline and presentation slides clearly communicate a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.

13 to >11.0 pts

Competent
The outline and presentation slides communicate a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.

11 to >9.0 pts

Limited
The outline and presentation slides attempt to communicate a central idea, but need more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.

9 to >7.0 pts

Poor
The outline and presentation slides lack a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding

7 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The outline and presentation slides do not address this competency.

16 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Information Literacy

21 to >19.0 pts

Excellent
The outline and presentation slides demonstrate a strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and diverse academic research.

19 to >16.0 pts

Competent
The outline and presentation slides use key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently.

16 to >13.0 pts

Limited
The outline and presentation slides use limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to the main idea.

13 to >11.0 pts

Poor
The outline and presentation slides do not provide evidence to help support a clear argument.

11 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The outline and presentation slides do not address this competency

21 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Technology Literacy

16 to >14.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation slides expertly use technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and achieve assignment goals.

14 to >12.0 pts

Competent
The presentation slides utilize some features of technology applications, media and electronic resources to develop and support assignment requirements.

12 to >10.0 pts

Limited
The presentation slides use limited technology features, media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.

10 to >8.0 pts

Poor
The presentation slides lack an effective use of technology, media and electronic resources.

8 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The presentation does not address this competency

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Cultural Competence

21 to >18.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation slides demonstrate strong evidence of audience awareness.

18 to >15.0 pts

Competent
The presentation slides demonstrate some evidence of audience awareness.

15 to >14.0 pts

Limited
The presentation slides demonstrate limited evidence of audience awareness.

14 to >13.0 pts

Poor
The presentation slides lack audience awareness.

13 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The presentation slides do not address this competency.

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSpeech Materials: Global Awareness & Civic Engagement

26 to >23.0 pts

Excellent
The speech materials demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

23 to >20.0 pts

Competent
The speech materials demonstrate proficient understanding of best practices for speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

20 to >16.0 pts

Limited
The speech materials demonstrate a vague understanding of speech preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

16 to >13.0 pts

Poor
The speech materials lack a clear understanding of speech and research delivery preparation and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

13 to >0 pts

Does Not Meet Expectations
The speech materials do not address this competency.

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.A.Critical Thinking

SPCH275 Student Mastery of Critical Thinking skills 

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.B.Communication

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Communicates a central idea through precise use of language, attention to audience, grammar and mechanics, and communication conventions and formats appropriate to the genre.

3 pts

Competent: Communicates a central idea by demonstrating proficient use of language, audience awareness, grammar and mechanics and communication conventions appropriate to the genre.

2 pts

Limited: Attempts to communicate a central idea, but needs more proficient use of language, stronger attention to audience, and a more precise utilization of communication conventions. Grammar and mechanics need improvement.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks a clear understanding of language usage, audience awareness, and communication competence. Grammar and mechanics inhibit understanding.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.C.Information Literacy

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Strong development of central arguments through detailed examples and evidence of appropriate and resourceful academic research.

3 pts

Competent: Uses key examples from mostly reputable sources to develop a central argument. Evidence could be utilized more efficiently to support claims.

2 pts

Limited: Uses limited, incomplete, or inappropriate information as vague support for central ideas. Evidence is not cohesively connected to main ideas.

1 pts

Poor: The central argument is not supported or developed through evidence.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.D.Technology Literacy

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Demonstrates clear understanding of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources to achieve assignment goals

3 pts

Competent: Demonstrates some knowledge of technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Media and electronic resources to support assignment requirements.

2 pts

Limited: Minimal knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Utilizes media and electronic resources superficially for minimal impact.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks a clear knowledge of the technology for creating presentation materials to support speech making. Does not utilize media and electronic resources effectively.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student Performance: Does not demonstrate this competency.

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.E.Cultural Competence

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Strong evidence of audience awareness.

3 pts

Competent: Some evidence of audience awareness.

2 pts

Fair: Limited evidence of audience awareness.

1 pts

Poor: Lacks audience awareness.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

 This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGE.SPCH275.F.Global Awareness & Civic Engagement

threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Demonstrates a sophisticated understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

3 pts

Competent: Demonstrates proficient understanding of the speech preparation process, and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

2 pts

Limited: demonstrates a vague understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

1 pts

Poor: lack understanding of the speech preparation process and using visual elements to effectively engage the audience.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Does not demonstrate this competency

Total Points: 150

Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code: STUDYSAVE

Order a unique copy of this paper

600 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
Top Academic Writers Ready to Help
with Your Research Proposal

Order your essay today and save 25% with the discount code GREEN