20170814161828eng215_appendix_a_peer_review_feedback_form__sapp xPEERREVIEW1 x
Using feedback from your professor and classmates, revise Part 1 and develop the solution and identify the advantages of the solution. Note: The disadvantages or challenges with your answers will be in Part 3.
Write a six to eight (6-8) page paper in which you:
Provide Part I: Revision of A Problem Exists (3-4 pages)
1. Revise, using feedback from the professor and classmates, your Persuasive Paper Part I: A Problem Exists.
Develop Part 2: Solution to Problem and Advantages (3-4 pages for 6-8 pages total)
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement clearly in the first paragraph. (The thesis statement may need to be modified to reflect added information and purpose of this part.)
3. Explain a detailed, viable solution that supports your thesis. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
4. State, explain, and support the first advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
5. State, explain, and support the second advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
6. State, explain, and support the third (and fourth if desired) advantage (economic, social, political, environmental, social, equitable, ethical/moral, etc.) to your solution. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs.
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
8. Provide a concluding paragraph / transitional paragraph that summarizes the proposed solution and its advantages.
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion.
10. Use one (1) or more rhetorical strategies (ethos, logos, pathos) to explain advantages.
11. Support advantage claims with at least three (3) additional quality relevant references. Use at least six (6) total for Parts 1 and 2. Note: Wikipedia and other Websites do not qualify as academic resources.
Your assignment must follow these formatting guidelines:
Note: Submit your assignment to the designated plagiarism program so that you can make revisions before submitting your paper to your professor.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
haven’t got a revise report back yet so i am waiting on that. But my professor love the last essay. I want to continue working with you.
Quick run down. The 1st paper you did we have to correct what the peer review says and start on the next 3 pages. In all it suppose to be 6-8 pages as instructed.
ENG 215 – Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
|
Reviewer’s Name: _Katrina Rodriguez |
Date: __August 12, 2017 |
Writer’s Assigned #: Corinthia_Sapp2 |
|
Course:___ENG 215_ |
Section:__ |
Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists
Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. Follow these instructions:
1) Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor (in class if on-ground; by e-mail if online).
2) Copy the Peer Review Feedback Form from the Appendix.
3) Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
4) Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper to your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the Assignment Tab in the course shell.
Criteria |
+ Strengths |
Comments < Areas for Improvement |
1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). |
Introduction paragraph grabs reader attention and makes them wonder what the paper is going to be about |
|
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (With revised thesis statement.) |
Thesis statement was not clearly stated. |
|
3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
History and status of issue was stated |
|
4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1- 2) paragraphs. |
An issue was presented. |
|
5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Could have presented more detail on issue to made it clearer to understand. Couldn’t tell if there were different issues or the same one presented but in a different way. |
|
6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
||
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper. |
Paper was easy to read with words used |
|
8. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. |
No direct solution was given |
|
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion |
Paper was constructed coherently |
|
10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. |
Sources were cited |
|
11. Other |
Overall I felt it was a good paper with a few minor grammar errors |
ENG 215 – Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
Appendix A: Peer Review Feedback Form 1 |
|
Reviewer’s Name: _Katrina Rodriguez |
Date: __August 12, 2017 |
Writer’s Assigned #: Corinthia_Sapp2 |
|
Course:___ENG 215_ |
Section:__ |
Assignment 3: Persuasive Paper Part 1: A Problem Exists
Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. Follow these instructions:
1) Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor (in class if on-ground; by e-mail if online).
2) Copy the Peer Review Feedback Form from the Appendix.
3) Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
4) Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper to your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the Assignment Tab in the course shell.
Criteria |
+ Strengths |
Comments < Areas for Improvement |
1. Provide an appropriate title and an interesting opening paragraph to appeal to your stated audience (appeal with logic, ethics, or emotion). |
Introduction paragraph grabs reader attention and makes them wonder what the paper is going to be about |
|
2. Include a defensible, relevant thesis statement in the first paragraph. (With revised thesis statement.) |
Thesis statement was not clearly stated. |
|
3. Describe the history and status of the issue and provide an overview of the problem(s) that need to be addressed. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
History and status of issue was stated |
|
4. Explain the first problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1- 2) paragraphs. |
An issue was presented. |
|
5. Explain the second problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
Could have presented more detail on issue to made it clearer to understand. Couldn’t tell if there were different issues or the same one presented but in a different way. |
|
6. Explain the third problem (economic, social, political, environmental, complexity, inequity, ethical/moral, etc.) and provide support for your claims. This should be one or two (1-2) paragraphs. |
||
7. Use effective transitional words, phrases, and sentences throughout the paper. |
Paper was easy to read with words used |
|
8. Provide a concluding paragraph that summarizes the stated problems and promises a solution. |
No direct solution was given |
|
9. Develop a coherently structured paper with an introduction, body, and conclusion |
Paper was constructed coherently |
|
10. Support claims with at least three (3) quality, relevant references. Use credible, academic sources available through Strayer University’s Resource Center. |
Sources were cited |
|
11. Other |
Overall I felt it was a good paper with a few minor grammar errors |