Week2 Assignment: Feedback is in the document you sent me. Make sure you use Blackboard to submit all discussions and assignments going forward, even if late. See the rubric for points earned and my comments in the document for feedback. In the future, for that final readability piece (the third component of the rubric), to earn full points, follow the structure presented by the discussion prompt and my additional comments at the start of the week in the discussion thread.
Nice job using my requested format for your response. I was unclear as to when you were discussing Volmert et al. and when you were discussing Stroh. Instead of referring to “he” or “they,” use the author’s name to ensure it is clear who you are referring to. Your critique of Volmert et al. seemed to slide into discussing Volmert. Also, your understanding of the four challenges to change discussed by Stroh is unclear. Please see my PowerPoint and presentation from Week 2, as well as Ch 3 of the text. We can also meet to discuss if it is still unclear to you.
Week 3 Discussion: Good job! With an issue like immigration and crossing border, it will be really important for you to go back and look at the resources on power and then apply those concepts to your social problem. We can meet and talk about it as undocumented immigration is one of my expertise areas!
WK2Assgn
For this assignment, you were asked to state the problem, reframe the problem, apply systems thinking (MCFL), and address what conventional vs systems approaches look like in your problem. See the rubric for points earned and my comments in the uploaded document linked above for specific feedback to you.
Week 6 Discussion
I would revise your problem statement to note that Haitian refugees is not the problem, but rather how they are received (or not received) in the US is the problem you are addressing.
The paper lacks clarity and coherence. Errors in grammar, sentence structure, and punctuation are major, pervasive (12+), and interfere with the message. The paper shows little or no attention to scholarly voice, organization, and focus.
Student consistently paraphrases source information incorrectly (resulting in accidental plagiarism) and/or relies exclusively on direct quotes.
Citations are infrequent or missing. Little or no attempt has been made to provide a reference list. Little or no attempt has been made to format the paper in APA Style.
