Health Information Exchange in the Kingdom
Create a PowerPoint presentation that reviews four articles written in the last five (5) years on sharing patient information in a cloud-based Health Information Exchange (HIE) in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Your presentation should cover the following concepts:
Discuss how data creates information in the EHR so that it can be shared.
Discuss how patient health information is protected in the cloud.
Evaluate how health information systems help healthcare organizations to provide increased access to healthcare.
Discuss how informatics support the use of information systems and technology to improve the way work is done in the healthcare setting.
Discuss how leaders engage their staff so that the information systems meet their daily work needs.
Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the cloud-based HIE.
Provide recommendations to improve workflows and processes in an information system.
Provide your conclusions.
Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements:
Be 11 slides in length, not including the title or reference slides.
Be formatted APA writing guidelines.
Provide support for your statements with citations from a minimum of six scholarly articles. These citations should be listed in the Notes section of the slide in which they appear.
In-text citations.
Each slide must provide detailed speaker’s notes to support the slide content. These should be a minimum of 100 words long (per slide) and must be a part of the presentation.
Utilize the following headings to organize the content in your presentation:
Data Creates Information in the EHR
Protecting Health Information in the Cloud
Increasing Access to Health Care
Informatics to Improve Processes
Leadership Support
Advantages and Disadvantages of Cloud-Based HIE
Recommendations
Conclusion
SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2
Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements Exceeds Expectation
-Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Meets Expectation
– Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Below Expectation
– Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Limited Evidence –
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Content Exceeds Expectation
– Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge
of the materials,
with no errors or
major omissions.
Meets Expectation
– Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
Below Expectation
– Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
Limited Evidence –
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Analysis Exceeds Expectation
– Provides strong
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
Meets Expectation
– Provides
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Below Expectation
– Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Limited Evidence –
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Exceeds Expectation
– Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria,
and are well chosen
to provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Meets Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Below Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria,
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Limited Evidence –
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 1-4 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Exceeds Expectation
– Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
Meets Expectation
– Project is fairly
well organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Below Expectation
– Project is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Limited Evidence –
Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 2
paragraph structure;
contains no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 105
