Immigration or Same Sex Marriage
Create a 15-20-slide presentation or a 15-20-minute speech on either same-sex marriage or immigration policy.
Note: You must complete this assessment before starting on Assessment 5.
Many of the current political, legal, and social debates in U.S. society concern diversity and its related issues. Two of those debates have centered on immigration policy and same-sex marriage. These debates involve not only arguments regarding discriminatory treatment of particular ethnic groups or sexual minorities but also legal, economic, and religious questions and concerns.
In this assessment, you apply the sociological perspective to one of these debates. You research the political players and key arguments on the different sides of your chosen controversy, and you place them in historical and contemporary context to gain a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of the debate, and current and proposed policy solutions. Understanding the key developments and policy changes that pertain to your debate puts you in a position in which you can more accurately evaluate the merits of arguments made by politicians, leaders, and others with a stake in shaping future policy decisions.
Demonstration of Proficiency
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:
· Competency 1: Describe theoretical ideas of power in relation to policy.
. Discuss how sociological theory can be used to understand disparities in political power.
· Competency 2: Identify historical and contemporary influences of discrimination in U.S. culture.
. Describe the evolution of the social movements that have emerged as a result of a diversity issue.
· Competency 3: Analyze the effects of social policy using aggregated data.
. Address questions that reflect public perception using supporting data or research.
· Competency 4: Analyze how laws are applied or created based on race, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, age, and social class.
. Analyze the evolution of antidiscrimination law to give context to current law or policy.
· Competency 5: Apply diversity strategies in professional, educational, and personal contexts.
. Discuss tactics employed by activists to promote a cause.
· Competency 6: Communicate effectively.
. Write coherently to support a central idea in appropriate format and with few errors of grammar, usage, and mechanics.
Instructions
Your task in this assessment is to choose one of two debates—same-sex marriage or immigration policy—and create a presentation that would be delivered at a symposium on a college campus. You will need to place the debate in historical context, which will involve researching the history of policy as it pertains to your chosen topic and the social movements that developed as a result—for example, the gay rights movement. You will also be asked to address potential questions audience members might ask in this kind of situation.
Your presentation should demonstrate your understanding of the debate you have chosen, as well as your ability to apply the sociological perspective to a complex and controversial social issue.
Focusing on either same-sex marriage or immigration policy, create a PowerPoint presentation for the hypothetical audience you are addressing that addresses each of the items below. Include graphics with supporting data in the form of charts, tables, or graphs when appropriate, and include any other information that supports your message. Be sure to include extensive speaker’s notes (using the Notes feature in PowerPoint, which allows you to add notes to each slide) to provide detailed descriptions of each of the topics covered in the presentation
Complete the following:
· Provide an overview and description of the central issue you have chosen to address.
· Describe the evolution of the social movements (the gay rights movement or immigration rights movements, for example) that are a precursor for or have emerged as a result of your chosen issue.
. Include a time line with key events to provide historical context.
. Describe any milestones that have characterized the development of the social movement involving your issue.
· Briefly analyze the following for your selected topic:
. The evolution of federal legislation on the topic over the past 10 years.
. The current political landscape, including key political debates related to your central issue.
· Introduce the important political players in the national debate.
· Explain how at least one specific sociological theory can be used to understand why some players have more power than others in this debate. Examples of theories include conflict theory, power elite theory, and human capital theory.
· Discuss how the continued uncertainty in political and legal environments affects stakeholders who are seeking to expand their rights or challenge existing policies.
. Describe tactics activists on either side of the debate have used to further the cause.
· The symposium coordinator has sent you the questions below in anticipation of your visit. Draft answers for each, typing your answers in the Notes box below the Questions slide you have created, if you are doing a PowerPoint presentation. If you are writing a speech, include the questions and answers at the end. Support your answers with research and data from scholarly sources. Choose the set of questions that is appropriate for your chosen topic.
. Immigration:
. “Ninety percent of illegal immigrants are on the public dole. Why are we giving welfare benefits to people who aren’t citizens?”
. “Mexicans are taking away our jobs. What is the best way to stop them?”
· Same-sex marriage:
. “I heard 75 percent of people are against gay marriage. Who are they?”
. “If we allow gays to marry, won’t it destroy our social fabric?”
Additional Requirements
· Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
· Length: If you chose to do a PowerPoint presentation, it should contain 15–20 slides. Slides should contain no more than a few bulleted points and/or a graphic. Rather than cramming slides with text, use the Notes box below each slide to explain and expand on your bulleted points in each slide. If a written speech is chosen, it should be 15–20 minutes long when read aloud, aloud or at least 1500 words.
· Format: Include a title and reference slides or pages. Cite any sources used in current APA style and format.
· Sources: Cite at least six credible scholarly sources to support your presentation
2/16/22, 11’12 AM
Framing an Issue From the Sociological Perspective Scoring Guide
Page 1 of 1https://courserooma.capella.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/SOC-FPX/SOC-FPX2000/190700/Scoring_Guides/u04a1_scoring_guide.html
Framing an Issue From the Sociological Perspective Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Discuss how
sociological theory
can be used to
understand
disparities in
political power.
Does not list ways
that sociological
theory can be used
to understand
disparities in
political power.
Lists way that
sociological theory can
be used to understand
disparities in political
power.
Discusses how
sociological theory
can be used to
understand
disparities in
political power.
Analyzes how sociological
theory can be used to
understand disparities in
political power and cites
scholarly sources for
support.
Describe the
evolution of the
social movements
that have emerged
as a result of a
diversity issue.
Does not describe
the evolution of the
social movements
that have emerged
as a result of a
diversity issue.
Describes the evolution
of the social movements
that have emerged as a
result of a diversity issue
but is vague on the
rationale for their
interconnectedness.
Describes the
evolution of the
social movements
that have emerged
as a result of a
diversity issue.
Analyzes the evolution of
the social movements that
have emerged as a result of
a diversity issue and cites
support from scholarly
resources.
Address questions
that reflect public
perception using
supporting data or
research.
Does not address
questions that
reflect public
perception using
supporting data or
research.
Addresses questions
that reflect public
perception using data or
research that is
inadequate or
inappropriate.
Addresses
questions that
reflect public
perception using
supporting data or
research.
Addresses questions that
reflect public perception
using supporting data or
research and real-world
examples in a persuasive
way that illuminates facts
surrounding the issues.
Analyze the
evolution of
antidiscrimination
law to give context to
current law or policy.
Does not discuss
the evolution of
antidiscrimination
law to give context
to current law or
policy.
Discusses the evolution
of antidiscrimination law
to give context to current
law or policy.
Analyzes the
evolution of
antidiscrimination
law to give context
to current law or
policy.
Analyzes the evolution of
antidiscrimination law to
give context to current law
or policy and cites scholarly
resources for support.
Discuss tactics
employed by
activists to promote
a cause.
Does not list tactics
employed by
activists to promote
a cause.
Lists tactics employed
by activists to promote a
cause.
Discusses tactics
employed by
activists to
promote a cause.
Analyzes the effectiveness
of tactics employed by
activists to promote a
cause.
Write coherently to
support a central
idea in appropriate
format and with few
errors of grammar,
usage, and
mechanics.
Does not write
coherently to
support a central
idea in appropriate
format. Does not
use correct
grammar, usage,
and mechanics.
Writes to support an
idea. Format is
inconsistent and
contains major errors of
grammar, usage, and
mechanics.
Writes coherently
to support a
central idea in
appropriate format
and with few
errors of grammar,
usage, and
mechanics.
Writes coherently, using
evidence to support a
central idea in a
consistently appropriate
format with correct
grammar, usage, and
mechanics.
