Population Health Management
Research six articles on the challenges of providing access to healthcare in the Kingdom for the population by considering patient demographics and geographic considerations.
Explain the patient education strategies that are needed to overcome some of these challenges. Explain how this strategy supports the mission, vision, and values of Saudi Vision 2030. Summarize the benefits to Saudi patients, healthcare organizations, and healthcare providers.
Requirements:
five pages in length, not including the title and reference pages.
include of six credible sources.
APA style guidelines, as appropriate.
SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements Exceeds Expectation
-Includes all of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Meets Expectation
– Includes most of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Below Expectation
– Includes some of
the required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
Limited Evidence –
Includes few of the
required
components, as
specified in the
assignment.
21-25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Content Exceeds Expectation
– Demonstrates
substantial and
extensive knowledge
of the materials,
with no errors or
major omissions.
Meets Expectation
– Demonstrates
adequate
knowledge of the
materials; may
include some
minor errors or
omissions.
Below Expectation
– Demonstrates fair
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes some
major errors or
omissions.
Limited Evidence –
Fails to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials and/or
includes many
major errors or
omissions.
25-30 Points 19-24 Points 13-18 Points 7-12 Points
Analysis Exceeds Expectation
– Provides strong
thought, insight, and
analysis of concepts
and applications.
Meets Expectation
– Provides
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Below Expectation
– Provides poor
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
Limited Evidence –
Provides little or no
thought, insight,
and analysis of
concepts and
applications.
13-15 Points 10-12 Points 7-9 Points 4-6 Points
Sources Exceeds Expectation
– Sources go above
and beyond
required criteria,
and are well chosen
to provide effective
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Meets Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria
and are adequately
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Below Expectation
– Sources meet
required criteria,
but are poorly
chosen to provide
substance and
perspectives on the
issue under
examination.
Limited Evidence –
Source selection
and integration of
knowledge from
the course is
clearly deficient.
Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 1-4 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Exceeds Expectation
– Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and
Meets Expectation
– Project is fairly
well organized and
written, and is in
proper format as
outlined in the
assignment.
Below Expectation
– Project is poorly
organized and
written, and may
not follow proper
format as outlined
in the assignment.
Limited Evidence –
Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not
in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Poor
quality work;
SEU HCM570
Critical Thinking Writing Rubric – Module 4
paragraph structure;
contains no errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Reasonably good
sentence and
paragraph
structure; may
include a few
minor errors in
grammar, spelling,
APA style, or APA
citations and
references.
Inconsistent to
inadequate
sentence and
paragraph
development,
and/or includes
numerous or major
errors in grammar,
spelling, APA style,
or APA citations
and references.
unacceptable in
terms of grammar,
spelling, APA style,
and APA citations
and references.
Total points possible = 105
