2/5/22, 7:51 PM Preview Rubric: Product Review (M3 Tasks) – CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online) – Northeastern Illinois University
https://neiu.desire2learn.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=2982504&rubricId=34634&originTool=quicklinks 1/3
Product Review (M3 Tasks)
Course: CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online)
Criteria Excellent Good work
Needs some
improvement
Not quite there Criterion Score
Intro of the
paper
/ 20
Decisions of
Users (before,
during
and
after)
/ 20
2
0 points
The paper has an
intro which
details the
product
reviewed. The
task chosen is
discussed
including the
reasons why
someone would
perform the
task.
1
7 points
The product and
task are
specified,
however the
answer to why
someone would
perform
the
task
is missing.
13 points
Brief intro with
vague answer
(e.g. someone
would perform
this task because
it is convenient)
without any
specifics.
0 points
It is not clear
what product is
reviewed with
respect to what
task.
20 points
Details the
decisions of
users
before,during
and after
performing the
task and the
outcomes
(consequences)
of these
decisions
17.1 points
Details the
decisions of
users
before,during
and after
performing the
task, but not the
outcomes.
15.1 points
Details the
decisions of
users
before,during or
after performing
the task, but not
all three. Does
not list the
outcomes.
5 points
Decisions are
vague or
nonexistant
2/5/22, 7:51 PM Preview Rubric: Product Review (M3 Tasks) – CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online) – Northeastern Illinois University
https://neiu.desire2learn.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=2982504&rubricId=34634&originTool=quicklinks 2/3
Criteria Excellent Good work
Needs some
improvement
Not quite there Criterion Score
Affordances
and
Conventions
/ 20
Difficulty of
the task
/ 10
Flow Diagram / 20
20 points
Speaks of
affordances and
conventions
correctly
15 points
Speaks of
affordances and
conventions
vaguely or
wrongly (e.g. it
affords
performing the
task).
10 points
Speaks of
affordances OR
conventions in a
vague way
0 points
Does not
mention
affordances or
conventions.
10 points
Describes in
detail what is
difficult in this
task
8.6 points
Describes
vaguely or non-
convinvingly
what is difficult
about the task
(essentially
picking any
activity within
the task)
7.5 points
Does not
describe a
difficult task or
states that
there’s nothing
difficult about
the task
0 points
Does not answer.
20 points
Flow diagram
conforms to the
standards of a
flow diagram and
it is detailed
enough to see
decisions and
potential hard
sub
processes.
17 points
Flow diagram is
made ad-hoc
without
following
standards. There
are decisions
clearly
presented.
12 points
Flow diagram is
made ad-hoc
without any
decisions in it
and just a flow of
processes.
0 points
Flow diagram is
not present.
2/5/22, 7:51 PM Preview Rubric: Product Review (M3 Tasks) – CS_342_2_202220 Introduction to HCI (online) – Northeastern Illinois University
https://neiu.desire2learn.com/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=2982504&rubricId=34634&originTool=quicklinks 3/3
Total / 100
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Good work
Needs some
improvement
Not quite there Criterion Score
Propose a
feature
change
/ 1010 points
Proposed a new
feature change
based on the
difficulties and
decisions
detected
8 points
Proposed a new
feature that is
actually present
in some
alternatives (e.g.
if you are
reviewing a
corded mouse
and propose it to
be wifi)
7 points
Proposes a new
feature that does
not derive from
the difficulties
and decisions
identified.
0 points
Does not
propose changes
Level 4
23 points minimum
Level 3
17 points minimum
Level 2
11 points minimum
Level 1
0 points minimum
