Summary of solution and protocals (task force introduces Agile as way of working for company that is waterfall (SDLC))

Instructions for Deliverable

1. Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade. You can learn more about the specific skills being assessed by reviewing the links in Problem-Based Learning Resources(new tab).
2. As a team, create a practical and professional document formatted as a proposal for establishing a task force in your organization to deal with critical issues. Be sure your proposal addresses the problem thoroughly.
3. The Task Force Plan must follow this structure:

   Professional Cover​ Page
   List of Contributors​
   Table of Contents
   Executive Summary (one-page that includes the background, current state, and summary of solution)
   Organized Sections of Proposed Solutions (for example, goals, objectives, action steps, protocols, resources, definition of terms, etc.)
   References in APA format (for scholarly or practitioner resources that are cited or used within the plan)
   ​Appendices (OPTIONAL – attached materials, tools, documents, samples, templates, etc. that are part of the solution)

   Save Time On Research and Writing

   Hire a Pro to Write You a 100% Plagiarism-Free Paper.

   Get My Paper
4. One person from the team must submit the deliverable per the schedule outlined in your Team PBL Plan but no later than Workshop Four.

https://www.atlassian.com/agile

1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) – 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 1/3

Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points)
Course: 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B)

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement

Inadequate/Faili
ng

Criterion Score

Application of

Research

/ 15

Solutio

n

Proposal

/ 30

15 points

The deliverable

demonstrates

the team’s skillful

use of high-

quality, credible,

relevant sources

to develop ideas

that are

appropriate for

the solution.

13 points

The deliverable
demonstrates

the team’s use of

credible, relevant

sources to

support ideas

that are
appropriate for
the solution.

12 points

The deliverable
demonstrates

the team’s

attempt to use

some relevant

sources to

identify ideas

that are
appropriate for
the solution.

10 points

The deliverable
demonstrates
the team’s

inability to use

sources and

identify ideas
that are
appropriate for
the solution.

30 points

The deliverable

proposes a

thorough

solution that

addresses the

contextual,

ethical, logical,

social, and

cultural

dimensions of

the

problem.

27 points

The deliverable
proposes a
solution that

addresses some

of the

following

dimensions of

the problem:

contextual,
ethical, logical,
social, and

cultural.

24 points

The deliverable
proposes a

limited solution

that addresses

few of the

following
dimensions of
the problem:
contextual,
ethical, logical,
social, and
cultural.

21 points

The deliverable

does not

adequately

propose a

solution to the

problem.

1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) – 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 2/3Total

Criteria Excellent Competent
Needs
Improvement
Inadequate/Faili
ng
Criterion Score

Teamwork / 25

Written

Communicatio

n
/ 15

25 points

Teammates

interact well by

offering their

own

understanding

and perspectives,

asking questions

about ideas,

sharing

responsibility,

and contributing

equally.

Teammates

demonstrate

effective

interpersonal

communication

and engage in

resolving

conflicts

together.

23 points

Teammates

interact to

adequately meet

expectations.

20 points

Teammates

attempt to work

with each other,

but demonstrate

limited

interaction or an

imbalance of

responsibility

that impedes

collaboration.

18 points

Teammates do

not communicate

well and/or

follow through

on individual

responsibilities

to achieve team

goals.

15 points

The deliverable is

presented

professionally

and is easy to

read and

understand. It

demonstrates

the effective

control of

grammar and

spelling.

In-text citations

and references

are correctly

formatted using

APA.

13 points
The deliverable is
presented
professionally

and is readable.

It demonstrates

the basic control

of grammar and

spelling, with

only minimal

errors.

In-text citations
and references
are correctly
formatted using
APA.
12 points
The deliverable is

lacking in

professional

presentation. At

times it is

difficult to read

or understand

due to issues

with grammar

and spelling.

In-text citations
and references

are attempted,

but incorrectly

formatted.

10 points
The deliverable

is not

professional. It is

difficult to read
or understand

due to many

issues with

grammar and
spelling.

No in-text

citations or

references are

appropriately

used.

1/30/22, 3:00 AM Preview Rubric: Step 3 Task Force Plan Proposal (85 Points) – 3WI2022 Vir Ldrshp Global Based Teams (BADM-703-01B) – Indiana Wesleyan…

https://brightspace.indwes.edu/d2l/lp/rubrics/preview.d2l?ou=157107&rubricId=482276&originTool=quicklinks 3/3

Total
/ 85

Overall Score

Excellent
78 points minimum

Competent
69 points minimum

Needs Improvement
61 points minimum

Inadequate/Failing
0 points minimum